« Back To Blog Posts

North Carolina’s New Stance on Drug Trafficking Fines

In an effort to combat the escalating crisis of drug overdoses and trafficking, North Carolina is making a bold move. Starting December 1, 2023, the state will implement significantly higher fines for trafficking certain dangerous drugs, including heroin, fentanyl, and carfentanil. This decision marks a crucial point in North Carolina’s fight against drug-related offenses, aiming to deter traffickers with stricter financial penalties. But what does this mean for the people of North Carolina, and how does it fit into the larger conversation about justice and fairness in drug sentencing? Let’s break it down into simpler terms.

Understanding the New Fines

Under the previous law, fines for drug trafficking varied based on the drug type and the amount trafficked, with penalties ranging from $50,000 to $500,000. The new legislation introduces a dramatic increase in these fines for trafficking specific substances. Here’s a quick comparison:

  • Level I Trafficking (4 – 13.9 grams): Previously $50,000, now $500,000.
  • Level II Trafficking (14 – 27.9 grams): Was $100,000, now $750,000.
  • Level III Trafficking (28 grams or more): Jumped from $500,000 to $1,000,000.

These adjustments signify a tenfold increase for Level I trafficking and substantial hikes for Levels II and III, marking one of the most significant policy shifts in recent years.

The Rationale Behind the Increase

The effect of the opioid crisis on North Carolina has been impactful. According to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, the state saw approximately 11 drug overdose deaths per day in 2022. Between 2020 and 2022, over 36,000 lives were lost to drug overdoses, with a significant portion of these deaths attributed to opioids, particularly fentanyl and its derivatives.

The state’s decision to increase fines for trafficking these substances is a response to their deadly impact. By imposing steeper financial penalties, lawmakers aim to deter the distribution of these drugs, thereby reducing availability and, hopefully, overdose deaths.

Legal Concerns and Constitutional Questions

While the intention behind the new fines is clear, they raise important legal and ethical questions. The U.S. Constitution, as well as the North Carolina state constitution, prohibit excessive fines. This principle ensures that penalties are fair and proportionate to the crime committed.

Critics argue that the new fines could be excessively punitive, especially for lower-level trafficking offenses or for individuals who play a minor role in a larger trafficking operation. The disparity between the street value of the drugs and the fines—sometimes more than 200 times the drug’s value—suggests a potential misalignment with the constitutional guard against excessive penalties.

Analyzing the Fine’s Impact

Financial Disparity

Consider the street value of heroin, which was approximately $420 per gram in 2021, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Adjusting for inflation, a gram might now be worth around $600. Therefore, trafficking just over 4 grams—barely qualifying for a Level I offense—could result in drugs valued at roughly $2,400 but a fine of $500,000. This vast discrepancy raises questions about whether the punishment fits the crime, especially for those not deeply entrenched in the drug trade.

Who Gets Affected?

It’s crucial to differentiate between major traffickers and those at the fringes of the drug trade, such as individuals struggling with addiction or those acting under coercion. The new fines do not distinguish between these scenarios, potentially subjecting low-level offenders to the same steep fines as major drug traffickers.

Ability to Pay

The defendant’s ability to pay is another critical consideration. For many caught in the web of drug trafficking, particularly those without significant financial resources, these fines could spell financial ruin. The law mandates these fines without accounting for an individual’s financial situation, raising further concerns about fairness and the effectiveness of such penalties as a deterrent.

Looking Ahead: Legal Challenges and Defenses

As these new fines come into effect, they will likely face challenges on constitutional grounds. Defense attorneys are expected to argue that the fines are disproportionate to the crime, especially in cases involving lower-level offenses or defendants with limited involvement. Legal challenges may focus on the fine’s alignment with the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits excessive fines.

Defenders may also consider the total circumstances of the offense, including the individual’s role in the trafficking operation, the actual harm caused, and the defendant’s financial status. Such a comprehensive approach could provide a more nuanced understanding of the crime and its appropriate punishment.

Advice for Defenders

Legal practitioners working with clients facing these new fines should prepare to challenge their imposition vigorously. By arguing the fines’ constitutional excessiveness and highlighting the specific circumstances of each case, defenders can advocate for fairer, more proportional penalties. It’s also advisable for attorneys to request hearings that consider the defendant’s financial situation and overall culpability, potentially leading to reduced fines based on constitutional protections.


North Carolina’s decision to increase fines for drug trafficking reflects a serious commitment to addressing the opioid crisis. However, the effectiveness of these measures, alongside their alignment with principles of fairness and justice, remains to be seen. As this new policy is put into practice, the balance between deterrence and fairness and the legal challenges that will inevitably arise will shape the future of drug sentencing in the state. This significant policy change is not just about punishing crime but also about sparking a broader conversation on how we address drug trafficking, addiction, and recovery in our communities.